Side-by-side comparison

NABISCO WHEAT THINS CRACKERS ORIGINAL 1X1 OZ vs ANOVA SNAPPER

ANOVA SNAPPER wins by 24 points on FoodScore. Nutrient breakdown below — green values are better per field.

0/ 100

snack

NABISCO WHEAT THINS CRACKERS ORIGINAL 1X1 OZ

Poor · 1 pack (28g)

0/ 100

snack

ANOVA SNAPPER

Good · 6 ONZ

Per 100gNABISCO WHEAT THINS CRACKERS ORIGINAL 1X1 OZANOVA SNAPPER

Calories464.29 kcal100 kcal

Protein7.14 g20.59 g

Fiber7.18 g0 g

Total fat16.11 g1.47 g

Saturated fat1.78 g0 g

Added sugar10 g0 g

Sodium750 mg64.71 mg

Potassium303.57 mg417.06 mg

Calcium94.29 mg32 mg

Iron3.5 mg0 mg

Comparison uses per-100g nutrient values from USDA FoodData Central. Each field is marked in green for the option that is healthier on that specific row — but the final FoodScore weighs all fields together plus processing level (NOVA) to produce a single 0–100 number.