Side-by-side comparison
NADA MOO! CHOCOLATE ALMOND CHIP vs GARDEN OF EATIN' GARDEN OF EATIN, TUSCOLA COUNTRY BLUE CORN, TORTILLA CHIPS, SEA SALT, SEA SALT
GARDEN OF EATIN' GARDEN OF EATIN, TUSCOLA COUNTRY BLUE CORN, TORTILLA CHIPS, SEA SALT, SEA SALT wins by 52 points on FoodScore. Nutrient breakdown below — green values are better per field.
Verdict
FoodScore: NADA MOO! CHOCOLATE ALMOND CHIP scores 28/100, GARDEN OF EATIN' GARDEN OF EATIN, TUSCOLA COUNTRY BLUE CORN, TORTILLA CHIPS, SEA SALT, SEA SALT scores 80/100. GARDEN OF EATIN' GARDEN OF EATIN, TUSCOLA COUNTRY BLUE CORN, TORTILLA CHIPS, SEA SALT, SEA SALT wins by 52 points on added sugar (0g vs 8.6g per 100 g) and saturated fat (1.8g vs 9.6g per 100 g).
Comparison uses per-100g nutrient values from USDA FoodData Central. Each field is marked in green for the option that is healthier on that specific row — but the final FoodScore weighs all fields together plus processing level (NOVA) to produce a single 0–100 number.