FoodScore

Side-by-side comparison

O, THAT'S GOOD! CHICKEN WITH WHITE & WILD RICE SOUP, CHICKEN WITH WHITE & WILD RICE vs EREWHON CORN FLAKES ORGANIC MILLED CORN & SEA SALT, CORN FLAKES

EREWHON CORN FLAKES ORGANIC MILLED CORN & SEA SALT, CORN FLAKES wins by 24 points on FoodScore. Nutrient breakdown below — green values are better per field.

Verdict

FoodScore: O, THAT'S GOOD! CHICKEN WITH WHITE & WILD RICE SOUP, CHICKEN WITH WHITE & WILD RICE scores 44/100, EREWHON CORN FLAKES ORGANIC MILLED CORN & SEA SALT, CORN FLAKES scores 68/100. EREWHON CORN FLAKES ORGANIC MILLED CORN & SEA SALT, CORN FLAKES wins by 24 points on saturated fat (0g vs 3.4g per 100 g) and sodium (176mg vs 336mg per 100 g).

Per 100gO, THAT'S GOOD! CHICKEN WITH WHITE & WILD RICE SOUP, CHICKEN WITH WHITE & WILD RICEEREWHON CORN FLAKES ORGANIC MILLED CORN & SEA SALT, CORN FLAKES
Calories100.84 kcal382.35 kcal
Protein5.04 g8.82 g
Fiber1.7 g2.9 g
Total fat5.46 g0 g
Saturated fat3.36 g0 g
Added sugar0 g0 g
Sodium336.13 mg175.88 mg
Potassium0 mg175.88 mg
Calcium84.03 mg0 mg
Iron0.61 mg1.06 mg

Comparison uses per-100g nutrient values from USDA FoodData Central. Each field is marked in green for the option that is healthier on that specific row — but the final FoodScore weighs all fields together plus processing level (NOVA) to produce a single 0–100 number.