Side-by-side comparison

PACIFIC ISLES, FRIED CRISPY PORK SKINS CRACKLINS vs BABY RUTH BAR

PACIFIC ISLES, FRIED CRISPY PORK SKINS CRACKLINS wins by 61 points on FoodScore. Nutrient breakdown below — green values are better per field.

Verdict

FoodScore: PACIFIC ISLES, FRIED CRISPY PORK SKINS CRACKLINS scores 61/100, BABY RUTH BAR scores 0/100. PACIFIC ISLES, FRIED CRISPY PORK SKINS CRACKLINS wins by 61 points on added sugar (0g vs 37.8g per 100 g) and saturated fat (10.7g vs 12.2g per 100 g).

0/ 100

snack

PACIFIC ISLES, FRIED CRISPY PORK SKINS CRACKLINS

Good · 0.5 ONZ

0/ 100

snack

BABY RUTH BAR

Avoid · 2 BARS

Per 100gPACIFIC ISLES, FRIED CRISPY PORK SKINS CRACKLINSBABY RUTH BAR

Calories570.71 kcal459.46 kcal

Protein64.29 g5.41 g

Fiber0 g2.7 g

Total fat35.71 g21.59 g

Saturated fat10.71 g12.19 g

Added sugar0 g37.83 g

Sodium857.14 mg230 mg

Potassium0 mg0 mg

Calcium0 mg54.05 mg

Iron0 mg0 mg

Comparison uses per-100g nutrient values from USDA FoodData Central. Each field is marked in green for the option that is healthier on that specific row — but the final FoodScore weighs all fields together plus processing level (NOVA) to produce a single 0–100 number.