Side-by-side comparison

PACIFIC SEAFOODS WILD PANKO GALAMARI RINGS, WILD PANKO CALAMARI vs INCOGMEATO 100% PLANT PROTEIN PLANT BASED GROUND

INCOGMEATO 100% PLANT PROTEIN PLANT BASED GROUND wins by 24 points on FoodScore. Nutrient breakdown below — green values are better per field.

Verdict

FoodScore: PACIFIC SEAFOODS WILD PANKO GALAMARI RINGS, WILD PANKO CALAMARI scores 43/100, INCOGMEATO 100% PLANT PROTEIN PLANT BASED GROUND scores 67/100. INCOGMEATO 100% PLANT PROTEIN PLANT BASED GROUND wins by 24 points on protein (17.7g vs 8g per 100 g) and fiber (6.2g vs 0.9g per 100 g).

0/ 100

other

PACIFIC SEAFOODS WILD PANKO GALAMARI RINGS, WILD PANKO CALAMARI

Poor · 4 ONZ

0/ 100

other

INCOGMEATO 100% PLANT PROTEIN PLANT BASED GROUND

Good · 4 ONZ

Per 100gPACIFIC SEAFOODS WILD PANKO GALAMARI RINGS, WILD PANKO CALAMARIINCOGMEATO 100% PLANT PROTEIN PLANT BASED GROUND

Calories115.04 kcal230.09 kcal

Protein7.96 g17.7 g

Fiber0.9 g6.2 g

Total fat1.33 g14.16 g

Saturated fat0 g3.54 g

Added sugar0 g0 g

Sodium336.28 mg353.98 mg

Potassium0 mg575.22 mg

Calcium0 mg159.29 mg

Iron0 mg3.19 mg

Comparison uses per-100g nutrient values from USDA FoodData Central. Each field is marked in green for the option that is healthier on that specific row — but the final FoodScore weighs all fields together plus processing level (NOVA) to produce a single 0–100 number.