Side-by-side comparison

PUBLIX BAKERY CHOCOLATE FLORENTINE OLD-FASHIONED TEA COOKIES, CHOCOLATE FLORENTINE vs LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW

LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW wins by 82 points on FoodScore. Nutrient breakdown below — green values are better per field.

0/ 100

beverage

PUBLIX BAKERY CHOCOLATE FLORENTINE OLD-FASHIONED TEA COOKIES, CHOCOLATE FLORENTINE

Avoid · 1.1 ONZ

0/ 100

beverage

LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW

Very good · 1 BAR

Per 100gPUBLIX BAKERY CHOCOLATE FLORENTINE OLD-FASHIONED TEA COOKIES, CHOCOLATE FLORENTINELARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW

Calories500 kcal470.59 kcal

Protein3.33 g9.8 g

Fiber3.3 g9.8 g

Total fat30 g25.49 g

Saturated fat15 g4.9 g

Added sugar28 g0 g

Sodium167 mg0 mg

Potassium0 mg745.1 mg

Calcium67 mg78.04 mg

Iron3.6 mg3.53 mg

Comparison uses per-100g nutrient values from USDA FoodData Central. Each field is marked in green for the option that is healthier on that specific row — but the final FoodScore weighs all fields together plus processing level (NOVA) to produce a single 0–100 number.