Side-by-side comparison

PUBLIX BAKERY CHOCOLATE FLORENTINE OLD-FASHIONED TEA COOKIES, CHOCOLATE FLORENTINE vs LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW

LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW wins by 82 points on FoodScore. Nutrient breakdown below — green values are better per field.

Verdict

FoodScore: PUBLIX BAKERY CHOCOLATE FLORENTINE OLD-FASHIONED TEA COOKIES, CHOCOLATE FLORENTINE scores 0/100, LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW scores 82/100. LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW wins by 82 points on added sugar (0g vs 28g per 100 g) and saturated fat (4.9g vs 15g per 100 g).

0/ 100

beverage

PUBLIX BAKERY CHOCOLATE FLORENTINE OLD-FASHIONED TEA COOKIES, CHOCOLATE FLORENTINE

Avoid · 1.1 ONZ

0/ 100

beverage

LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW

Very good · 1 BAR

Per 100gPUBLIX BAKERY CHOCOLATE FLORENTINE OLD-FASHIONED TEA COOKIES, CHOCOLATE FLORENTINELARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW

Calories500 kcal470.59 kcal

Protein3.33 g9.8 g

Fiber3.3 g9.8 g

Total fat30 g25.49 g

Saturated fat15 g4.9 g

Added sugar28 g0 g

Sodium167 mg0 mg

Potassium0 mg745.1 mg

Calcium67 mg78.04 mg

Iron3.6 mg3.53 mg

Comparison uses per-100g nutrient values from USDA FoodData Central. Each field is marked in green for the option that is healthier on that specific row — but the final FoodScore weighs all fields together plus processing level (NOVA) to produce a single 0–100 number.