FoodScore

Side-by-side comparison

PUBLIX BAKERY, ALMOND BARK WITH COCOA vs LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW

LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW wins by 73 points on FoodScore. Nutrient breakdown below — green values are better per field.

Verdict

FoodScore: PUBLIX BAKERY, ALMOND BARK WITH COCOA scores 9/100, LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW scores 82/100. LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW wins by 73 points on added sugar (0g vs 33.3g per 100 g) and saturated fat (4.9g vs 23.8g per 100 g).

0/ 100
beverage
PUBLIX BAKERY, ALMOND BARK WITH COCOA
Avoid · 1.5 ONZ
Per 100gPUBLIX BAKERY, ALMOND BARK WITH COCOALARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW
Calories547.62 kcal470.59 kcal
Protein7.14 g9.8 g
Fiber4.81 g9.8 g
Total fat35.71 g25.49 g
Saturated fat23.81 g4.9 g
Added sugar33.33 g0 g
Sodium143.1 mg0 mg
Potassium0 mg745.1 mg
Calcium143.1 mg78.04 mg
Iron2.57 mg3.53 mg

Comparison uses per-100g nutrient values from USDA FoodData Central. Each field is marked in green for the option that is healthier on that specific row — but the final FoodScore weighs all fields together plus processing level (NOVA) to produce a single 0–100 number.