FoodScore

Side-by-side comparison

RAFFAELLO, ALMOND COCONUT TREAT vs LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW

LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW wins by 78 points on FoodScore. Nutrient breakdown below — green values are better per field.

Verdict

FoodScore: RAFFAELLO, ALMOND COCONUT TREAT scores 4/100, LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW scores 82/100. LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW wins by 78 points on added sugar (0g vs 23.3g per 100 g) and saturated fat (4.9g vs 30g per 100 g).

0/ 100
beverage
RAFFAELLO, ALMOND COCONUT TREAT
Avoid · 3 PIECES
Per 100gRAFFAELLO, ALMOND COCONUT TREATLARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW
Calories633.33 kcal470.59 kcal
Protein6.67 g9.8 g
Fiber3.3 g9.8 g
Total fat50 g25.49 g
Saturated fat30 g4.9 g
Added sugar23.31 g0 g
Sodium117 mg0 mg
Potassium0 mg745.1 mg
Calcium133 mg78.04 mg
Iron1.2 mg3.53 mg

Comparison uses per-100g nutrient values from USDA FoodData Central. Each field is marked in green for the option that is healthier on that specific row — but the final FoodScore weighs all fields together plus processing level (NOVA) to produce a single 0–100 number.