Side-by-side comparison

RICOLINO MARSHMALLOW WITH CHOCOLATE FLAVORED MINI PALETA PAYASO, MARSHMALLOW WITH CHOCOLATE vs LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW

LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW wins by 79 points on FoodScore. Nutrient breakdown below — green values are better per field.

Verdict

FoodScore: RICOLINO MARSHMALLOW WITH CHOCOLATE FLAVORED MINI PALETA PAYASO, MARSHMALLOW WITH CHOCOLATE scores 3/100, LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW scores 82/100. LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW wins by 79 points on added sugar (0g vs 52g per 100 g) and saturated fat (4.9g vs 10g per 100 g).

0/ 100

beverage

RICOLINO MARSHMALLOW WITH CHOCOLATE FLAVORED MINI PALETA PAYASO, MARSHMALLOW WITH CHOCOLATE

Avoid · 1 piece

0/ 100

beverage

LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW

Very good · 1 BAR

Per 100gRICOLINO MARSHMALLOW WITH CHOCOLATE FLAVORED MINI PALETA PAYASO, MARSHMALLOW WITH CHOCOLATELARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW

Calories360 kcal470.59 kcal

Protein4 g9.8 g

Fiber0 g9.8 g

Total fat10 g25.49 g

Saturated fat10 g4.9 g

Added sugar52 g0 g

Sodium60 mg0 mg

Potassium112 mg745.1 mg

Calcium24 mg78.04 mg

Iron4 mg3.53 mg

Comparison uses per-100g nutrient values from USDA FoodData Central. Each field is marked in green for the option that is healthier on that specific row — but the final FoodScore weighs all fields together plus processing level (NOVA) to produce a single 0–100 number.