FoodScore

Side-by-side comparison

ROCHE BROS. CHOCOLATE TOFFEE ALMONDS, CHOCOLATE TOFFEE vs LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW

LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW wins by 64 points on FoodScore. Nutrient breakdown below — green values are better per field.

Verdict

FoodScore: ROCHE BROS. CHOCOLATE TOFFEE ALMONDS, CHOCOLATE TOFFEE scores 18/100, LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW scores 82/100. LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW wins by 64 points on added sugar (0g vs 40g per 100 g) and saturated fat (4.9g vs 13.3g per 100 g).

Per 100gROCHE BROS. CHOCOLATE TOFFEE ALMONDS, CHOCOLATE TOFFEELARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW
Calories533.33 kcal470.59 kcal
Protein10 g9.8 g
Fiber3.3 g9.8 g
Total fat33.3 g25.49 g
Saturated fat13.3 g4.9 g
Added sugar40 g0 g
Sodium100 mg0 mg
Potassium313 mg745.1 mg
Calcium173 mg78.04 mg
Iron2.4 mg3.53 mg

Comparison uses per-100g nutrient values from USDA FoodData Central. Each field is marked in green for the option that is healthier on that specific row — but the final FoodScore weighs all fields together plus processing level (NOVA) to produce a single 0–100 number.