FoodScore

Side-by-side comparison

ROCHE BROS. WHITE NONPAREILS, WHITE vs LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW

LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW wins by 78 points on FoodScore. Nutrient breakdown below — green values are better per field.

Verdict

FoodScore: ROCHE BROS. WHITE NONPAREILS, WHITE scores 4/100, LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW scores 82/100. LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW wins by 78 points on added sugar (0g vs 53.6g per 100 g) and saturated fat (4.9g vs 17.9g per 100 g).

0/ 100
beverage
ROCHE BROS. WHITE NONPAREILS, WHITE
Avoid · 8 pieces
Per 100gROCHE BROS. WHITE NONPAREILS, WHITELARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW
Calories464.29 kcal470.59 kcal
Protein3.57 g9.8 g
Fiber3.61 g9.8 g
Total fat32.11 g25.49 g
Saturated fat17.89 g4.9 g
Added sugar53.6 g0 g
Sodium0 mg0 mg
Potassium671.43 mg745.1 mg
Calcium92.86 mg78.04 mg
Iron6.43 mg3.53 mg

Comparison uses per-100g nutrient values from USDA FoodData Central. Each field is marked in green for the option that is healthier on that specific row — but the final FoodScore weighs all fields together plus processing level (NOVA) to produce a single 0–100 number.