Side-by-side comparison

SEA FARE PACIFIC WILD CAUGHT ALBACORE TUNA, SEA SALT vs SIGNATURE SELECT SWEET & SPICY CHILI SAUCE, SWEET & SPICY CHILI

SEA FARE PACIFIC WILD CAUGHT ALBACORE TUNA, SEA SALT wins by 80 points on FoodScore. Nutrient breakdown below — green values are better per field.

Verdict

FoodScore: SEA FARE PACIFIC WILD CAUGHT ALBACORE TUNA, SEA SALT scores 80/100, SIGNATURE SELECT SWEET & SPICY CHILI SAUCE, SWEET & SPICY CHILI scores 0/100. SEA FARE PACIFIC WILD CAUGHT ALBACORE TUNA, SEA SALT wins by 80 points on added sugar (0g vs 35g per 100 g) and sodium (209mg vs 1471mg per 100 g).

0/ 100

prepared

SEA FARE PACIFIC WILD CAUGHT ALBACORE TUNA, SEA SALT

Very good · 1.5 ONZ

0/ 100

prepared

SIGNATURE SELECT SWEET & SPICY CHILI SAUCE, SWEET & SPICY CHILI

Avoid · 2 Tbsp

Per 100gSEA FARE PACIFIC WILD CAUGHT ALBACORE TUNA, SEA SALTSIGNATURE SELECT SWEET & SPICY CHILI SAUCE, SWEET & SPICY CHILI

Calories186.05 kcal211.05 kcal

Protein25.58 g0 g

Fiber0 g0 g

Total fat10.51 g0 g

Saturated fat2.33 g0 g

Added sugar0 g35 g

Sodium209.07 mg1471.05 mg

Potassium0 mg0 mg

Calcium0 mg0 mg

Iron2.51 mg0 mg

Comparison uses per-100g nutrient values from USDA FoodData Central. Each field is marked in green for the option that is healthier on that specific row — but the final FoodScore weighs all fields together plus processing level (NOVA) to produce a single 0–100 number.