FoodScore

Side-by-side comparison

SIGNATURE, SELECT, WHITE CHOCOLATE WITH BLUEBERRY vs LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW

LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW wins by 82 points on FoodScore. Nutrient breakdown below — green values are better per field.

Verdict

FoodScore: SIGNATURE, SELECT, WHITE CHOCOLATE WITH BLUEBERRY scores 0/100, LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW scores 82/100. LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW wins by 82 points on added sugar (0g vs 36.8g per 100 g) and saturated fat (4.9g vs 22.5g per 100 g).

Per 100gSIGNATURE, SELECT, WHITE CHOCOLATE WITH BLUEBERRYLARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW
Calories575 kcal470.59 kcal
Protein5 g9.8 g
Fiber0 g9.8 g
Total fat37.5 g25.49 g
Saturated fat22.5 g4.9 g
Added sugar36.75 g0 g
Sodium88 mg0 mg
Potassium0 mg745.1 mg
Calcium200 mg78.04 mg
Iron0 mg3.53 mg

Comparison uses per-100g nutrient values from USDA FoodData Central. Each field is marked in green for the option that is healthier on that specific row — but the final FoodScore weighs all fields together plus processing level (NOVA) to produce a single 0–100 number.