Side-by-side comparison

SKINNYGIRL CANE SUGAR SWEET UNCURED HAM, CANE SUGAR SWEET vs ALASKA SEAFOOD WILD PINK SALMON

ALASKA SEAFOOD WILD PINK SALMON wins by 23 points on FoodScore. Nutrient breakdown below — green values are better per field.

Verdict

FoodScore: SKINNYGIRL CANE SUGAR SWEET UNCURED HAM, CANE SUGAR SWEET scores 47/100, ALASKA SEAFOOD WILD PINK SALMON scores 70/100. ALASKA SEAFOOD WILD PINK SALMON wins by 23 points on added sugar (0g vs 4.9g per 100 g) and saturated fat (0.6g vs 0.9g per 100 g).

0/ 100

prepared

SKINNYGIRL CANE SUGAR SWEET UNCURED HAM, CANE SUGAR SWEET

Decent · 3 Slices

0/ 100

prepared

ALASKA SEAFOOD WILD PINK SALMON

Good · 1 POUCH

Per 100gSKINNYGIRL CANE SUGAR SWEET UNCURED HAM, CANE SUGAR SWEETALASKA SEAFOOD WILD PINK SALMON

Calories140 kcal117.65 kcal

Protein17.51 g22.35 g

Fiber0 g0 g

Total fat2.63 g2.35 g

Saturated fat0.88 g0.59 g

Added sugar4.91 g0 g

Sodium824.56 mg294.12 mg

Potassium0 mg423.53 mg

Calcium0 mg20.94 mg

Iron0.63 mg1.18 mg

Comparison uses per-100g nutrient values from USDA FoodData Central. Each field is marked in green for the option that is healthier on that specific row — but the final FoodScore weighs all fields together plus processing level (NOVA) to produce a single 0–100 number.