Side-by-side comparison

SOUR PATCH WATERMELON SOFT CANDY WATERMELON FAT FREE1X3.400 OZ vs LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW

LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW wins by 82 points on FoodScore. Nutrient breakdown below — green values are better per field.

0/ 100

beverage

SOUR PATCH WATERMELON SOFT CANDY WATERMELON FAT FREE1X3.400 OZ

Avoid · 11 pieces (39g)

0/ 100

beverage

LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW

Very good · 1 BAR

Per 100gSOUR PATCH WATERMELON SOFT CANDY WATERMELON FAT FREE1X3.400 OZLARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW

Calories358.97 kcal470.59 kcal

Protein0 g9.8 g

Fiber0 g9.8 g

Total fat0 g25.49 g

Saturated fat0 g4.9 g

Added sugar52.05 g0 g

Sodium37.95 mg0 mg

Potassium0 mg745.1 mg

Calcium1 mg78.04 mg

Iron0.18 mg3.53 mg

Comparison uses per-100g nutrient values from USDA FoodData Central. Each field is marked in green for the option that is healthier on that specific row — but the final FoodScore weighs all fields together plus processing level (NOVA) to produce a single 0–100 number.