FoodScore

Side-by-side comparison

TOFURKY TURK'Y, CHED'AR & BROCCOLI PLANT-BASED POCKET, TURK'Y, CHED'AR & BROCCOLI vs HILTON'S PACIFIC OYSTERS

HILTON'S PACIFIC OYSTERS wins by 24 points on FoodScore. Nutrient breakdown below — green values are better per field.

Verdict

FoodScore: TOFURKY TURK'Y, CHED'AR & BROCCOLI PLANT-BASED POCKET, TURK'Y, CHED'AR & BROCCOLI scores 43/100, HILTON'S PACIFIC OYSTERS scores 67/100. HILTON'S PACIFIC OYSTERS wins by 24 points on saturated fat (0.4g vs 2g per 100 g) and sodium (106mg vs 438mg per 100 g).

0/ 100
other
TOFURKY TURK'Y, CHED'AR & BROCCOLI PLANT-BASED POCKET, TURK'Y, CHED'AR & BROCCOLI
Poor · 1 pocket
0/ 100
other
HILTON'S PACIFIC OYSTERS
Good · 4 ONZ
Per 100gTOFURKY TURK'Y, CHED'AR & BROCCOLI PLANT-BASED POCKET, TURK'Y, CHED'AR & BROCCOLIHILTON'S PACIFIC OYSTERS
Calories210.94 kcal80 kcal
Protein7.81 g9.73 g
Fiber2.3 g0 g
Total fat6.25 g2.21 g
Saturated fat1.95 g0.44 g
Added sugar0 g0 g
Sodium438.28 mg106.19 mg
Potassium242.19 mg168.14 mg
Calcium77.97 mg8 mg
Iron1.56 mg5.31 mg

Comparison uses per-100g nutrient values from USDA FoodData Central. Each field is marked in green for the option that is healthier on that specific row — but the final FoodScore weighs all fields together plus processing level (NOVA) to produce a single 0–100 number.