Side-by-side comparison

TRISCUIT CHERRIES & ALMONDS WHEATBERRY CLUSTERS, CHERRIES & ALMONDS vs BARILLA ENRICHED MACARONI PRODUCT, LINGUINE FINI

BARILLA ENRICHED MACARONI PRODUCT, LINGUINE FINI wins by 24 points on FoodScore. Nutrient breakdown below — green values are better per field.

Verdict

FoodScore: TRISCUIT CHERRIES & ALMONDS WHEATBERRY CLUSTERS, CHERRIES & ALMONDS scores 39/100, BARILLA ENRICHED MACARONI PRODUCT, LINGUINE FINI scores 63/100. BARILLA ENRICHED MACARONI PRODUCT, LINGUINE FINI wins by 24 points on added sugar (0g vs 14.3g per 100 g) and saturated fat (0g vs 1.8g per 100 g).

0/ 100

snack

TRISCUIT CHERRIES & ALMONDS WHEATBERRY CLUSTERS, CHERRIES & ALMONDS

Poor · 1 ONZ

0/ 100

snack

BARILLA ENRICHED MACARONI PRODUCT, LINGUINE FINI

Good · 2 ONZ

Per 100gTRISCUIT CHERRIES & ALMONDS WHEATBERRY CLUSTERS, CHERRIES & ALMONDSBARILLA ENRICHED MACARONI PRODUCT, LINGUINE FINI

Calories464.29 kcal357.14 kcal

Protein7.14 g12.5 g

Fiber7.11 g5.39 g

Total fat17.89 g1.79 g

Saturated fat1.79 g0 g

Added sugar14.3 g0 g

Sodium607.14 mg0 mg

Potassium428.57 mg210.71 mg

Calcium107.14 mg21.07 mg

Iron2.14 mg3.57 mg

Comparison uses per-100g nutrient values from USDA FoodData Central. Each field is marked in green for the option that is healthier on that specific row — but the final FoodScore weighs all fields together plus processing level (NOVA) to produce a single 0–100 number.