Side-by-side comparison

WHOLE CATCH COLD-SMOKED SOCKEYE SALMON WILD ALASKA, COLD-SMOKED vs BELLA PORTOFINO, SOLID ALBACORE TUNA WITH SEA SALT

BELLA PORTOFINO, SOLID ALBACORE TUNA WITH SEA SALT wins by 23 points on FoodScore. Nutrient breakdown below — green values are better per field.

Verdict

FoodScore: WHOLE CATCH COLD-SMOKED SOCKEYE SALMON WILD ALASKA, COLD-SMOKED scores 47/100, BELLA PORTOFINO, SOLID ALBACORE TUNA WITH SEA SALT scores 70/100. BELLA PORTOFINO, SOLID ALBACORE TUNA WITH SEA SALT wins by 23 points on sodium (339mg vs 1540mg per 100 g) and protein (30.4g vs 22.8g per 100 g).

0/ 100

prepared

WHOLE CATCH COLD-SMOKED SOCKEYE SALMON WILD ALASKA, COLD-SMOKED

Decent · 2 ONZ

0/ 100

prepared

BELLA PORTOFINO, SOLID ALBACORE TUNA WITH SEA SALT

Good · 2 ONZ

Per 100gWHOLE CATCH COLD-SMOKED SOCKEYE SALMON WILD ALASKA, COLD-SMOKEDBELLA PORTOFINO, SOLID ALBACORE TUNA WITH SEA SALT

Calories140 kcal161.07 kcal

Protein22.81 g30.36 g

Fiber0 g0 g

Total fat5.26 g5.36 g

Saturated fat0.88 g0.89 g

Added sugar0 g0 g

Sodium1540.35 mg339.29 mg

Potassium438.6 mg357.14 mg

Calcium0 mg0 mg

Iron0 mg0 mg

Comparison uses per-100g nutrient values from USDA FoodData Central. Each field is marked in green for the option that is healthier on that specific row — but the final FoodScore weighs all fields together plus processing level (NOVA) to produce a single 0–100 number.