Side-by-side comparison

WOLFGANG PUCK WP ORG RS TOM BISQ 14.5OZ vs Bumble Bee Premium Wild Pink Salmon

Bumble Bee Premium Wild Pink Salmon wins by 24 points on FoodScore. Nutrient breakdown below — green values are better per field.

Verdict

FoodScore: WOLFGANG PUCK WP ORG RS TOM BISQ 14.5OZ scores 45/100, Bumble Bee Premium Wild Pink Salmon scores 69/100. Bumble Bee Premium Wild Pink Salmon wins by 24 points on added sugar (0g vs 2.5g per 100 g) and saturated fat (1.6g vs 1.7g per 100 g).

0/ 100

prepared

WOLFGANG PUCK WP ORG RS TOM BISQ 14.5OZ

Decent · Per 1 cup

0/ 100

prepared

Bumble Bee Premium Wild Pink Salmon

Good · 2.2 ONZ

Per 100gWOLFGANG PUCK WP ORG RS TOM BISQ 14.5OZBumble Bee Premium Wild Pink Salmon

Calories57.92 kcal126.98 kcal

Protein0.83 g20.63 g

Fiber0.4 g0 g

Total fat2.5 g4.76 g

Saturated fat1.67 g1.59 g

Added sugar2.5 g0 g

Sodium182.92 mg428.57 mg

Potassium155.83 mg317.46 mg

Calcium36 mg158.73 mg

Iron0.25 mg0.57 mg

Comparison uses per-100g nutrient values from USDA FoodData Central. Each field is marked in green for the option that is healthier on that specific row — but the final FoodScore weighs all fields together plus processing level (NOVA) to produce a single 0–100 number.