FoodScore
0/ 100
AvoidbeverageEBINGER'S· 3 COOKIES

EBINGER'S CHOCOLATE CHIP COOKIES, CHOCOLATE CHIP

EBINGER'S CHOCOLATE CHIP COOKIES receive a FoodScore of 3/100 (Avoid), primarily due to their **high added sugar content** and status as an ultra-processed food.

  • FoodScore: 3/100 (Avoid) indicates this product offers minimal nutritional benefit.
  • Contains 36.7g of added sugar per 100g, a significant contributor to its low score.
  • Classified as NOVA 4, meaning it is an ultra-processed food.
  • Provides 3.3g of fiber per 100g, a small positive contribution.
  • Best consumed infrequently and in small portions, as a treat rather than a dietary staple.
  • Scores -29 points above the beverage category average (32/100 across 3796 foods).
Fiber
3.3g
12% of Daily Value
Protein
3.33g
7% of Daily Value
Added sugar
36.7g
73% of Daily Value
Sodium
267mg
12% of Daily Value
+
What it brings to the table
Fiber (3.3g)+3
Micronutrients (Iron)+2
What holds it back
Added sugar (36.7g)-25
Saturated fat (10g)-14
Ultra-processed (NOVA 4)-10
Concentrated ultra-processed fat-3

Why it scores 3

EBINGER'S CHOCOLATE CHIP COOKIES achieved a FoodScore of 3 out of 100, indicating it is not a recommended choice for regular consumption according to dietary guidelines. The primary factor driving this low score is the high amount of added sugar, at 36.7 grams per 100 grams, which incurred a significant penalty of -25 points. Additionally, the product contains 10 grams of saturated fat per 100 grams, leading to a -14 point penalty. As a NOVA 4 classified food, it is considered ultra-processed, resulting in a -10 point deduction. The presence of concentrated ultra-processed fat further reduced the score by -3 points. While the product does offer 3.3 grams of fiber per 100 grams, earning +3 points, and 2.33 mg of iron (13% DV), contributing +2 points, these small bonuses are largely overshadowed by the substantial penalties. Ingredients like sugar and vegetable shortening (palm, soybean oils) are key contributors to the unfavorable macro-nutrient profile. Compared to a baseline of plain sparkling water or unsweetened iced tea, this product provides a high caloric density with minimal micronutrient contribution.

Health benefits

What the nutrients in ebinger's chocolate chip cookies, chocolate chip actually do for you, grounded in established dietary science.

Provides a Source of Iron

EBINGER'S CHOCOLATE CHIP COOKIES offer a modest amount of iron, providing 2.33 mg per 100 grams, which is 13% of the Daily Value. Iron is an essential mineral involved in oxygen transport and energy metabolism. While not a primary source, it can contribute to daily iron intake, particularly for individuals who may have difficulty meeting their needs from other foods. This can be a consideration when consumed as an occasional treat.

Contains Dietary Fiber

This product contains 3.3 grams of dietary fiber per 100 grams, which contributes positively to its nutritional profile. Fiber is important for digestive health and can help regulate blood sugar levels. While not a high-fiber food, this amount is a small benefit in a product category often devoid of fiber. It can contribute to the overall daily fiber intake when consumed in moderation.

Offers a Quick Energy Source

Due to its calorie and carbohydrate content, EBINGER'S CHOCOLATE CHIP COOKIES can provide a rapid source of energy. This can be useful in situations requiring a quick caloric boost, such as after intense physical activity or during periods of high energy expenditure. The carbohydrates present are readily available for the body to use as fuel, offering a temporary energy lift.

How to eat it

Chocolate chip cookies like EBINGER'S are typically consumed as a dessert or snack. They are often enjoyed with milk, coffee, or tea. Common pitfalls include overconsumption due to their palatability and high caloric density, leading to excessive intake of added sugars and saturated fats.

To manage portion sizes, consider having just one cookie and pairing it with a piece of fruit or a small handful of nuts to add fiber and healthy fats.
Instead of eating directly from the package, plate a single serving to help visualize and control intake.
For a more balanced snack, combine a small portion of these cookies with a source of protein, such as a glass of milk or a spoonful of Greek yogurt, to help increase satiety.
Things to keep in mind

Consumers should be aware that EBINGER'S CHOCOLATE CHIP COOKIES are classified as ultra-processed (NOVA 4) and contain several ingredients that may be a concern for some individuals. The product contains common allergens including wheat, eggs, milk, and soy, as indicated by the ingredient list. Individuals with sensitivities or allergies to these ingredients should avoid this product. The use of artificial flavors and various gums (guar gum, carob bean gum) are typical of ultra-processed foods. For individuals managing blood sugar, the high added sugar content (36.7g per 100g) is a significant factor to consider. The product also contains soy lecithin, a common emulsifier derived from soy.

Swap suggestions
Very good
Bumble Bee Foods, SARDINES IN SPRING WATER
Score82
Very good
LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW
Score82
Very good
WILD PLANET NO SALT ADDED WILD SARDINES IN WATER
Score82
Very good
GARDEN OF EATIN' GARDEN OF EATIN, TUSCOLA COUNTRY BLUE CORN, TORTILLA CHIPS, SEA SALT, SEA SALT
Score80
Very good
INCA'S GOLD YELLOW MACA ORGANIC GELATINIZED POWDER, YELLOW MACA
Score80
Very good
VEGA DRINK MIX, MINT LEMONADE
Score79
Reader questions
Is EBINGER'S CHOCOLATE CHIP COOKIES healthy?
EBINGER'S CHOCOLATE CHIP COOKIES received a FoodScore of 3/100, indicating it is not considered a healthy food choice for regular consumption. This is primarily due to its high added sugar and saturated fat content, and its classification as an ultra-processed food. It offers minimal micronutrient density.
How does EBINGER'S CHOCOLATE CHIP COOKIES compare to other cookies?
Compared to many other branded chocolate chip cookies, EBINGER'S CHOCOLATE CHIP COOKIES have a similar nutritional profile, often characterized by high levels of added sugar and saturated fat. For instance, a typical Chips Ahoy! cookie also contains significant added sugar and is ultra-processed. This product is not a standout in terms of nutritional quality within its category.
What is 'vegetable shortening' in these cookies?
The 'vegetable shortening' in EBINGER'S CHOCOLATE CHIP COOKIES is a blend of palm and soybean oils. These oils are used for texture and shelf stability but contribute to the product's saturated fat content (10g per 100g), which is a factor in its low FoodScore.
What is a reasonable portion size for these cookies?
The declared serving size for EBINGER'S CHOCOLATE CHIP COOKIES is 3 cookies. Given the high caloric density and added sugar, consuming this serving size infrequently as an occasional treat is advisable. For daily intake, smaller portions would be more aligned with dietary guidelines.
Can children eat these cookies?
Children can consume EBINGER'S CHOCOLATE CHIP COOKIES in moderation as an occasional treat. However, due to the high added sugar content, it's important to monitor intake to prevent excessive sugar consumption, which can contribute to dental issues and impact overall diet quality.

Explore more

CategoryAll beverages BrandAll EBINGER'S SKUs Competitor · 82/100Bumble Bee Foods, SARDINES IN SPRING WATER Competitor · 82/100LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW Head-to-headEBINGER'S CHOCOLATE CHIP COOKIES, CHOCOLATE CHIP vs. Bumble Bee Foods, SARDINES IN SPRING WATER Head-to-headEBINGER'S CHOCOLATE CHIP COOKIES, CHOCOLATE CHIP vs. LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW Head-to-headEBINGER'S CHOCOLATE CHIP COOKIES, CHOCOLATE CHIP vs. WILD PLANET NO SALT ADDED WILD SARDINES IN WATER Head-to-headEBINGER'S CHOCOLATE CHIP COOKIES, CHOCOLATE CHIP vs. GARDEN OF EATIN' GARDEN OF EATIN, TUSCOLA COUNTRY BLUE CORN, TORTILLA CHIPS, SEA SALT, SEA SALT

Data & references